New Interchange & Bridge Design Faces Unique Challenges
In their ongoing efforts to improve outdated roadways and bridges, the Iowa DOT turned to Shuck-Britson (a subsidiary of Snyder & Associates) to design a new interchange and bridge to carry County Road K-25 traffic over Interstate 29 in Woodbury County. The existing interchange and bridge were built between 1958 and 1960 and both had surpassed their design life. Due to unexpectedly soft soil conditions encountered below the surface during this construction period, the original four-span, 215'-long bridge planned for the location had to quickly be changed to an 18-span, 734'-long behemoth to compensate for the poor soil. In addition to not being cost-effective to replace this original bridge with an identical structure, there were several other factors that necessitated the reconstruction of the entire interchange, including:- A low vertical clearance that didn’t meet current guidelines. The bridge had been struck by tall vehicles on numerous occasions over the years.
- An outdated interchange geometry that resulted in severe angles where the ramps intersected with the county road, as well as encompassing a large existing footprint.
- The need to evaluate and compensate for the less-than-ideal soil conditions.
Concept Study for Evaluating Bridge Replacement Possibilities
Shuck-Britson staff performed a bridge replacement concept study to determine the optimal design for the location and conditions. Two-, four-, and eight-span bridges were evaluated as replacement options. Also, the study assessed the soil impact on the bridge and embankment designs, as well as determined all remedial alternatives. Further, the study provided preliminary cost information for the alternatives presented.
Prior to reconstruction, interchange geometry included ramp terminal intersections at angles as severe as 38° creating a relatively large footprint (left photo). Current design standards prefer intersection angles of 75° or more. Proposed geometry was designed to take advantage of the wide footprint and build a new interchange within the existing interchange (right photo). This eliminated the need for additional right-of-way and allowed staged construction to keep existing ramps open with limited disruptions.
